As BetterPartners’ business is
growing, several types of asset will be built. Here come the categories and the
rationale behind their growth.
1. Cash
& cash equivalent: the fee structure of our project requires our clients to
deposit certain amount of service fee up front. This up-front fee goes into the
“cash & cash equivalent” category and as we start more projects, the total
size of up-front fee will grow as well.
2. Accounts
receivable: accounts receivable in our business is the service fee excluding
up-front fee. This type of asset will grow as we start and complete more
projects.
Since we are a service provider,
we do not have many tangible assets such as property, plants and equipment. We
do have certain equipment such as printers and laptops which are regarded as
one-time investment at the very beginning of the business and whose value does
not fluctuate along with our business.
Both cash & cash equivalent
and accounts receivable tie closely with the single most important metric of
our business: number of projects. They are both indicators of the health of our
business in terms of both current status and growth potential. Therefore, both
of them factor into our working capital line of credit. Nevertheless, I would
argue that cash and cash equivalent serves worse as a business indicator than
accounts receivable because other elements, for example retained earnings and
owner’s equity, also influence this item, diluting its ability to directly
reflect business’ health.
Taking an upfront deposit is a helpful model both in terms of the client relationship (to demonstrate commitment) and also to help fund your operations. You seem to have a good handle on these dynamics.
ReplyDelete- CBB